Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNGAX vs RNPAX
CNGAX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CNGAX vs RNPAX
CNGAX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNGAX vs. RNPAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNGAX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. CNGAX (46.5B). RNPAX pays higher dividends than CNGAX: RNPAX (0.36) vs CNGAX (0.00). CNGAX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: CNGAX (24 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than CNGAX (0.75). CNGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RNPAX (23.00). CNGAX (250) and RNPAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CNGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.94 vs. RNPAX (12.54). CNGAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.12 vs. RNPAX (13.84).
| CNGAX | RNPAX | CNGAX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.49 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.49 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.858 | 6.908 | 331% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.5B | 164B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.94 | 12.54 | 327% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.91 | 39.50 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.12 | 13.84 | 319% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.96 | 101.68 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement