Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNGAX vs RNPAX
CNGAX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CNGAX vs RNPAX
CNGAX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNGAX vs. RNPAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNGAX is a Buy and RNPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. CNGAX (50B). RNPAX pays higher dividends than CNGAX: RNPAX (0.36) vs CNGAX (0.00). CNGAX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: CNGAX (25 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than CNGAX (0.75). CNGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RNPAX (23.00). CNGAX (250) and RNPAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CNGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.07 vs. RNPAX (2.70). CNGAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.47 vs. RNPAX (5.55).
| CNGAX | RNPAX | CNGAX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.49 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.49 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.683 | 6.007 | 294% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50B | 169B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.07 | 2.70 | 596% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.23 | 35.23 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.47 | 5.55 | 495% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.70 | 97.01 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement