CNM
Price
$55.22
Change
+$0.34 (+0.62%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
11.01B
60 days until earnings call
FERG
Price
$177.55
Change
+$1.10 (+0.62%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
44.25B
52 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CNM vs FERG

Header iconCNM vs FERG Comparison
Open Charts CNM vs FERGBanner chart's image
Core & Main
Price$55.22
Change+$0.34 (+0.62%)
Volume$1.72M
Capitalization11.01B
Ferguson Enterprises
Price$177.55
Change+$1.10 (+0.62%)
Volume$1.45M
Capitalization44.25B
CNM vs FERG Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FERG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNM vs. FERG commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNM is a Hold and FERG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CNM: $55.22 vs. FERG: $177.55)
Brand notoriety: CNM and FERG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wholesale Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNM: 69% vs. FERG: 89%
Market capitalization -- CNM: $11.01B vs. FERG: $44.25B
CNM [@Wholesale Distributors] is valued at $11.01B. FERG’s [@Wholesale Distributors] market capitalization is $44.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry ranges from $49.98B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFERG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CNM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FERG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CNM and FERG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FERG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FERG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNM is a better buy in the short-term than FERG.

Price Growth

CNM (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а +9.22% price change this week, while FERG (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was +4.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +3.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNM is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2025.

FERG is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wholesale Distributors (+3.23% weekly)

Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FERG($44.3B) has a higher market cap than CNM($11B). CNM has higher P/E ratio than FERG: CNM (26.64) vs FERG (25.27). CNM YTD gains are higher at: 8.466 vs. FERG (2.293). FERG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.81B vs. CNM (894M). FERG has more cash in the bank: 639M vs. CNM (1M). CNM has less debt than FERG: CNM (2.07B) vs FERG (5.29B). FERG has higher revenues than CNM: FERG (29.4B) vs CNM (6.7B).
CNMFERGCNM / FERG
Capitalization11B44.3B25%
EBITDA894M2.81B32%
Gain YTD8.4662.293369%
P/E Ratio26.6425.27105%
Revenue6.7B29.4B23%
Total Cash1M639M0%
Total Debt2.07B5.29B39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FERG: Fundamental Ratings
FERG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
59
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
24
SMR RATING
1..100
31
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNMFERG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CNM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FERG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACXP0.880.10
+12.20%
Acurx Pharmaceuticals
WRLD127.343.80
+3.08%
World Acceptance Corp
STX97.672.60
+2.73%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC
TCX16.410.38
+2.37%
Tucows
LBRT22.63-0.49
-2.12%
Liberty Energy

CNM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNM has been loosely correlated with FERG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNM jumps, then FERG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNM
1D Price
Change %
CNM100%
+0.62%
FERG - CNM
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
WSO - CNM
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
BECN - CNM
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
AIT - CNM
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
BXC - CNM
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
More

FERG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FERG has been loosely correlated with CNM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FERG jumps, then CNM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FERG
1D Price
Change %
FERG100%
+0.62%
CNM - FERG
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
BXC - FERG
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
AIT - FERG
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
SITE - FERG
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
BECN - FERG
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
More