CNO
Price
$53.86
Change
+$0.78 (+1.47%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
4.96B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MFC
Price
$42.93
Change
+$0.38 (+0.89%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
72.17B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNO vs MFC

CNO vs MFC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNO vs. MFC commentary
Oct 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNO is a Hold and MFC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNO vs MFC: Fundamental Ratings
CNO
MFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8980
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
94100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1824
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFC's Valuation (46) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as CNO (50). This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to CNO’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (5). This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's SMR Rating (94) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (100). This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (42). This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (24). This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNOMFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2026
Stock price -- (CNO: $53.86 vs. MFC: $42.93)
Brand notoriety: CNO and MFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNO: 79% vs. MFC: 66%
Market capitalization -- CNO: $4.96B vs. MFC: $72.17B
CNO [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $4.96B. MFC’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $72.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $228.36K to $140.68B. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $18.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CNO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CNO and MFC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFC is a better buy in the short-term than CNO.

Price Growth

CNO (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -0.22% price change this week, while MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -2.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -2.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNO is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

MFC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-2.36% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CNO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CETY1.000.02
+1.67%
Clean Energy Technologies Inc.
ATO157.170.79
+0.51%
Atmos Energy Corp
PAY30.830.02
+0.06%
Paymentus Holdings
LAWR3.75N/A
N/A
Robot Consulting Co Ltd
IMMX9.68-0.55
-5.38%
Immix Biopharma

CNO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNO has been loosely correlated with LNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNO jumps, then LNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNO
1D Price
Change %
CNO100%
+1.47%
LNC - CNO
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
MET - CNO
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
JXN - CNO
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
PRU - CNO
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
UNM - CNO
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
More

MFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFC has been loosely correlated with PUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFC jumps, then PUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFC
1D Price
Change %
MFC100%
+0.89%
PUK - MFC
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
MET - MFC
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
PRU - MFC
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
LNC - MFC
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
PRI - MFC
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
More