CNO
Price
$52.65
Change
+$0.22 (+0.42%)
Updated
Jul 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.91B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MFC
Price
$41.37
Change
+$0.19 (+0.46%)
Updated
Jul 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
69B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNO vs MFC

CNO vs MFC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNO vs. MFC commentary
Jul 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNO is a Hold and MFC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2026
Stock price -- (CNO: $52.64 vs. MFC: $41.36)
Brand notoriety: CNO and MFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNO: 87% vs. MFC: 54%
Market capitalization -- CNO: $4.91B vs. MFC: $69B
CNO [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $4.91B. MFC’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $154.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $18.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFC is a better buy in the long-term than CNO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MFC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CNO and MFC are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CNO (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +0.98% price change this week, while MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +1.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNO is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

MFC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.81% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFC($69B) has a higher market cap than CNO($4.91B). CNO has higher P/E ratio than MFC: CNO (20.75) vs MFC (16.47). CNO YTD gains are higher at: 24.922 vs. MFC (14.002). CNO has less debt than MFC: CNO (4.3B) vs MFC (13.4B). MFC has higher revenues than CNO: MFC (53.2B) vs CNO (4.51B).
CNOMFCCNO / MFC
Capitalization4.91B69B7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.92214.002178%
P/E Ratio20.7516.47126%
Revenue4.51B53.2B8%
Total CashN/A25B-
Total Debt4.3B13.4B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNO vs MFC: Fundamental Ratings
CNO
MFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
710
SMR RATING
1..100
8998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1750
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFC's Valuation (42) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as CNO (58). This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to CNO’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (10). This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's SMR Rating (89) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (98). This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (44). This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFC (50). This means that CNO’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNOMFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFY148.261.43
+0.97%
SoFi Select 500 ETF
SSPY98.030.04
+0.04%
Stratified LargeCap Index ETF
XHYE39.10N/A
N/A
BONDBLOXX ETF TRUST USD HIGH YIELD BOND ENERGY SECTOR ETF
LCDL0.72N/A
N/A
GraniteShares 2x Long LCID Daily ETF
SCZ82.16N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF

CNO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNO has been closely correlated with JXN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNO jumps, then JXN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNO
1D Price
Change %
CNO100%
+0.40%
JXN - CNO
70%
Closely correlated
+4.68%
MET - CNO
66%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
PRU - CNO
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
LNC - CNO
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.76%
GNW - CNO
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
More

MFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFC has been loosely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFC jumps, then MET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFC
1D Price
Change %
MFC100%
+0.44%
MET - MFC
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
PRU - MFC
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
PUK - MFC
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.07%
JXN - MFC
44%
Loosely correlated
+4.68%
LNC - MFC
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.76%
More