CNOBP
Price
$23.40
Change
+$0.14 (+0.60%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MBINM
Price
$25.39
Change
+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNOBP vs MBINM

Header iconCNOBP vs MBINM Comparison
Open Charts CNOBP vs MBINMBanner chart's image
ConnectOne Ban
Price$23.40
Change+$0.14 (+0.60%)
Volume$6.22K
CapitalizationN/A
Merchants Ban
Price$25.39
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Volume$8.44K
CapitalizationN/A
CNOBP vs MBINM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNOBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBINM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNOBP vs. MBINM commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNOBP is a Buy and MBINM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CNOBP: $23.40 vs. MBINM: $25.39)
Brand notoriety: CNOBP and MBINM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNOBP: 108% vs. MBINM: 63%
Market capitalization -- CNOBP: $0 vs. MBINM: $0
CNOBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. MBINM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNOBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBINM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNOBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBINM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CNOBP and MBINM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNOBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBINM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNOBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MBINM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNOBP is a better buy in the short-term than MBINM.

Price Growth

CNOBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.86% price change this week, while MBINM (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.49% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNOBP YTD gains are higher at: 4.865 vs. MBINM (2.969). CNOBP has more cash in the bank: 61.4M vs. MBINM (10.6M). MBINM has less debt than CNOBP: MBINM (964M) vs CNOBP (1.03B). MBINM has higher revenues than CNOBP: MBINM (559M) vs CNOBP (269M).
CNOBPMBINMCNOBP / MBINM
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.8652.969164%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue269M559M48%
Total Cash61.4M10.6M579%
Total Debt1.03B964M106%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNOBPMBINM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
16%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNOBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBINM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LVLU4.210.52
+14.09%
Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings Inc
BBU25.670.32
+1.26%
Brookfield Business Partners LPLimited Partnership Units
WVVIP3.170.02
+0.63%
Willamette Valley Vineyards
BBCP6.920.01
+0.14%
Concrete Pumping Holdings
WF54.73-0.47
-0.85%
Woori Financial Group

CNOBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNOBP has been loosely correlated with MSBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNOBP jumps, then MSBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNOBP
1D Price
Change %
CNOBP100%
+0.60%
MSBI - CNOBP
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
ONBPO - CNOBP
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
AFBI - CNOBP
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ESQ - CNOBP
36%
Loosely correlated
-5.85%
SBNY - CNOBP
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
More

MBINM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBINM has been loosely correlated with FHN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBINM jumps, then FHN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINM
1D Price
Change %
MBINM100%
+0.11%
FHN - MBINM
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.66%
WAL - MBINM
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
HWBK - MBINM
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
CNOBP - MBINM
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
HTBK - MBINM
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.13%
More