Ad is loading...
CNPAX vs ESGMX
CNPAX vs ESGMX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ESGMX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$62.43
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.32B
Mirova Global Megatrends A
Price$19.79
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets873.15M
CNPAX vs ESGMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ESGMX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and ESGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. ESGMX (873M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ESGMX: CNPAX (0.54) vs ESGMX (0.12). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ESGMX: CNPAX (23 years) vs ESGMX (9 years). ESGMX (1.24) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. ESGMX (18.00). ESGMX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESGMX: CNPAX (250) vs ESGMX (2500). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.29 vs. ESGMX (0.22). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.64 vs. ESGMX (38.07).
| CNPAX | ESGMX | CNPAX / ESGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.20 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.24 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.294 | -0.503 | -456% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 142B | 873M | 16,266% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.12 | 450% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.29 | 0.22 | 2,399% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.34 | 32.72 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.64 | 38.07 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers