Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs ESGMX
CNPAX vs ESGMX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs ESGMX
CNPAX vs ESGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. ESGMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and ESGMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. ESGMX (651M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than ESGMX: CNPAX (0.95) vs ESGMX (0.14). CNPAX was incepted earlier than ESGMX: CNPAX (24 years) vs ESGMX (10 years). ESGMX (1.26) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ESGMX (21.00). ESGMX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESGMX: CNPAX (250) vs ESGMX (2500). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.30 vs. ESGMX (4.89). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.61 vs. ESGMX (3.80).
| CNPAX | ESGMX | CNPAX / ESGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.20 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.26 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.450 | -2.058 | -313% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 651M | 26,421% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.14 | 694% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.30 | 4.89 | 272% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.51 | 26.54 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.61 | 3.80 | 437% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.08 | 124.48 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers