Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs FCGIX
CNPAX vs FCGIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs FCGIX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$72.43
Change+$0.33 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
NYLI PineStone Global Equity
Price$21.64
Change-$0.08 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.23M
CNPAX vs FCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. FCGIX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and FCGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FCGIX (42.2M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than FCGIX: CNPAX (0.48) vs FCGIX (0.40). CNPAX was incepted earlier than FCGIX: CNPAX (24 years) vs FCGIX (8 years). FCGIX (1.49) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGIX (19.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: CNPAX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.73 vs. FCGIX (4.88). FCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 47.66 vs. CNPAX (40.60).
| CNPAX | FCGIX | CNPAX / FCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.49 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.679 | 11.835 | 158% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 42.2M | 386,256% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.40 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.73 | 4.88 | 323% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.36 | 38.80 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.60 | 47.66 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement