Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs FCGIX
CNPAX vs FCGIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs FCGIX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$65.45
Change-$0.07 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.9B
NYLI PineStone Global Equity
Price$19.70
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.55M
CNPAX vs FCGIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. FCGIX commentary
Jun 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and FCGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 149B vs. FCGIX (44.6M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than FCGIX: CNPAX (0.51) vs FCGIX (0.43). CNPAX was incepted earlier than FCGIX: CNPAX (23 years) vs FCGIX (8 years). FCGIX (1.49) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGIX (7.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: CNPAX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.17 vs. FCGIX (1.29). FCGIX (49.95) and CNPAX (48.84) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CNPAX | FCGIX | CNPAX / FCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.49 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.242 | 1.809 | 400% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149B | 44.6M | 334,081% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.43 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.17 | 1.29 | 787% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.84 | 18.14 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.84 | 49.95 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers