Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs FCGIX
CNPAX vs FCGIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs FCGIX
CNPAX vs FCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. FCGIX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and FCGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FCGIX (44.2M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than FCGIX: CNPAX (0.97) vs FCGIX (0.53). CNPAX was incepted earlier than FCGIX: CNPAX (24 years) vs FCGIX (9 years). FCGIX (1.37) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). FCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: CNPAX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). FCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.37 vs. CNPAX (6.66). CNPAX (12.85) and FCGIX (12.29) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CNPAX | FCGIX | CNPAX / FCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.85 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.37 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | 6.448 | 76% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 44.2M | 384,615% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.53 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 8.37 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.46 | 21.95 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.85 | 12.29 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers