Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs FCGIX
CNPAX vs FCGIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs FCGIX
CNPAX vs FCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. FCGIX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and FCGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FCGIX (44M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than FCGIX: CNPAX (0.95) vs FCGIX (0.52). CNPAX was incepted earlier than FCGIX: CNPAX (24 years) vs FCGIX (9 years). FCGIX (1.37) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). FCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: CNPAX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. FCGIX (6.47). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.82 vs. FCGIX (13.12).
| CNPAX | FCGIX | CNPAX / FCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.85 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.37 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.325 | 5.667 | 94% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 44M | 386,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.52 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | 6.47 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | 20.92 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.82 | 13.12 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement