Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs FCGMX
CNPAX vs FCGMX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs FCGMX
CNPAX vs FCGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FCGMX (43.8M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than FCGMX: CNPAX (0.95) vs FCGMX (0.48). CNPAX was incepted earlier than FCGMX: CNPAX (24 years) vs FCGMX (3 years). FCGMX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). FCGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). FCGMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: FCGMX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.30 vs. FCGMX (11.53).
| CNPAX | FCGMX | CNPAX / FCGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.84 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.35 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.450 | 5.661 | 114% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 43.8M | 392,694% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.48 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.30 | 11.53 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.51 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.61 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement