Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs FCGMX
CNPAX vs FCGMX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs FCGMX
CNPAX vs FCGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FCGMX (44.2M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than FCGMX: CNPAX (0.97) vs FCGMX (0.48). CNPAX was incepted earlier than FCGMX: CNPAX (24 years) vs FCGMX (3 years). FCGMX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). FCGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). FCGMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: FCGMX (0) vs CNPAX (250). FCGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.35 vs. CNPAX (6.66).
| CNPAX | FCGMX | CNPAX / FCGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.84 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.35 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | 6.442 | 76% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 44.2M | 384,615% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.48 | 204% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 8.35 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.46 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.85 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers