Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs FCLZX
CNPAX vs FCLZX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs FCLZX
CNPAX vs FCLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FCLZX (59.3M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than FCLZX: CNPAX (0.95) vs FCLZX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than FCLZX: CNPAX (24 years) vs FCLZX (5 years). FCLZX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). FCLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). FCLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: FCLZX (0) vs CNPAX (250). FCLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.07 vs. CNPAX (7.37). FCLZX return over 5 years is better than : 66.83 vs. CNPAX (13.82).
| CNPAX | FCLZX | CNPAX / FCLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.90 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.09 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.325 | 13.818 | 39% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 59.3M | 286,678% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | 32.07 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | 77.87 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.82 | 66.83 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers