Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs FGEAX
CNPAX vs FGEAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs FGEAX
CNPAX vs FGEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. FGEAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and FGEAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FGEAX (181M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than FGEAX: CNPAX (0.97) vs FGEAX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than FGEAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs FGEAX (28 years). FGEAX (1.37) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). FGEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). FGEAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). FGEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: FGEAX (0) vs CNPAX (250). FGEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.04 vs. CNPAX (6.66). FGEAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.35 vs. CNPAX (12.85).
| CNPAX | FGEAX | CNPAX / FGEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.30 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.37 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | 10.469 | 47% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 181M | 93,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 8.04 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.46 | 41.22 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.85 | 26.35 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.25 | 83.21 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers