Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs GGGAX
CNPAX vs GGGAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs GGGAX
CNPAX vs GGGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. GGGAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a StrongBuy and GGGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. GGGAX (190M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than GGGAX: CNPAX (0.95) vs GGGAX (0.85). CNPAX was incepted earlier than GGGAX: CNPAX (25 years) vs GGGAX (27 years). GGGAX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. GGGAX (15.00). GGGAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGGAX: CNPAX (250) vs GGGAX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.90 vs. GGGAX (-7.54). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.24 vs. GGGAX (7.16).
| CNPAX | GGGAX | CNPAX / GGGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.90 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.47 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.566 | 2.826 | 232% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 190M | 88,947% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.85 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.90 | -7.54 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.63 | 44.17 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.24 | 7.16 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.91 | 113.60 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers