Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs GGGCX
CNPAX vs GGGCX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs GGGCX
CNPAX vs GGGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. GGGCX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and GGGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. GGGCX (190M). GGGCX pays higher dividends than CNPAX: GGGCX (1.06) vs CNPAX (0.95). CNPAX was incepted earlier than GGGCX: CNPAX (24 years) vs GGGCX (26 years). GGGCX (2.32) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. GGGCX (15.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGGCX: CNPAX (250) vs GGGCX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. GGGCX (-2.29). GGGCX return over 5 years is better than : 19.18 vs. CNPAX (15.21).
| CNPAX | GGGCX | CNPAX / GGGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.90 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.32 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.877 | 1.907 | 256% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 190M | 90,526% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.06 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | -2.29 | -411% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.13 | 41.54 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.21 | 19.18 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.88 | 101.16 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers