Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs GGGCX
CNPAX vs GGGCX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs GGGCX
CNPAX vs GGGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. GGGCX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and GGGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. GGGCX (188M). GGGCX pays higher dividends than CNPAX: GGGCX (1.06) vs CNPAX (0.95). CNPAX was incepted earlier than GGGCX: CNPAX (25 years) vs GGGCX (27 years). GGGCX (2.32) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. GGGCX (15.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGGCX: CNPAX (250) vs GGGCX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.64 vs. GGGCX (-7.14). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.54 vs. GGGCX (7.71).
| CNPAX | GGGCX | CNPAX / GGGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.90 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.32 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.176 | 3.900 | 158% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 188M | 89,894% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.06 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.64 | -7.14 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.31 | 47.68 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.54 | 7.71 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.98 | 96.85 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement