Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs GLVAX
CNPAX vs GLVAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs GLVAX
CNPAX vs GLVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. GLVAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and GLVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. GLVAX (548M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than GLVAX: CNPAX (0.97) vs GLVAX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than GLVAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs GLVAX (19 years). GLVAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. GLVAX (17.00). GLVAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLVAX: CNPAX (250) vs GLVAX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.66 vs. GLVAX (-1.68). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.85 vs. GLVAX (-2.61).
| CNPAX | GLVAX | CNPAX / GLVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.23 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.23 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | 6.093 | 81% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 548M | 31,022% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | -1.68 | -396% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.46 | 30.17 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.85 | -2.61 | -492% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.25 | 106.68 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement