Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs GLVAX
CNPAX vs GLVAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs GLVAX
CNPAX vs GLVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. GLVAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and GLVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. GLVAX (577M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than GLVAX: CNPAX (0.95) vs GLVAX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than GLVAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs GLVAX (19 years). GLVAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. GLVAX (17.00). GLVAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLVAX: CNPAX (250) vs GLVAX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. GLVAX (3.18). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.82 vs. GLVAX (1.67).
| CNPAX | GLVAX | CNPAX / GLVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.23 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.23 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.325 | 10.663 | 50% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 577M | 29,463% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | 3.18 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | 36.26 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.82 | 1.67 | 828% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.91 | 119.38 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement