Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs IGLGX
CNPAX vs IGLGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs IGLGX
CNPAX vs IGLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. IGLGX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and IGLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. IGLGX (795M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than IGLGX: CNPAX (0.95) vs IGLGX (0.25). CNPAX was incepted earlier than IGLGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs IGLGX (36 years). IGLGX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). IGLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). IGLGX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IGLGX: CNPAX (250) vs IGLGX (2000). IGLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.47 vs. CNPAX (3.52). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.97 vs. IGLGX (8.40).
| CNPAX | IGLGX | CNPAX / IGLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.20 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.23 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.449 | 10.793 | 32% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 795M | 21,384% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.25 | 388% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.52 | 6.47 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.93 | 32.78 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.97 | 8.40 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.77 | 110.61 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement