Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSAGX
CNPAX vs LSAGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSAGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$67.87
Change+$0.62 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.59B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth A
Price$22.85
Change+$0.18 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets127.83M
CNPAX vs LSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSAGX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and LSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. LSAGX (128M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: CNPAX (0.51) vs LSAGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSAGX: CNPAX (23 years) vs LSAGX (9 years). LSAGX (1.38) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSAGX (6.00). LSAGX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSAGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSAGX (2500). LSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.49 vs. CNPAX (10.86). CNPAX (50.81) and LSAGX (48.36) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CNPAX | LSAGX | CNPAX / LSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.20 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.38 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.208 | 10.263 | 109% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153B | 128M | 119,531% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.86 | 21.49 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.14 | 66.32 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.81 | 48.36 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.03 | N/A | - |