Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSAGX
CNPAX vs LSAGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSAGX
CNPAX vs LSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSAGX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and LSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. LSAGX (121M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: CNPAX (0.95) vs LSAGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSAGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSAGX (10 years). LSAGX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSAGX (12.00). LSAGX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSAGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSAGX (2500). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.35 vs. LSAGX (-2.30). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.64 vs. LSAGX (10.81).
| CNPAX | LSAGX | CNPAX / LSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.20 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.33 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.075 | -6.159 | -99% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 121M | 142,149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.35 | -2.30 | -364% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.17 | 43.36 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.64 | 10.81 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.69 | 117.89 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement