Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSAGX
CNPAX vs LSAGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSAGX
CNPAX vs LSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSAGX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and LSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. LSAGX (123M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: CNPAX (0.97) vs LSAGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSAGX: CNPAX (25 years) vs LSAGX (10 years). LSAGX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSAGX (12.00). LSAGX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSAGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSAGX (2500). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.49 vs. LSAGX (-3.37). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.27 vs. LSAGX (11.95).
| CNPAX | LSAGX | CNPAX / LSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.20 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.33 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.048 | -4.453 | -203% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 123M | 134,959% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.49 | -3.37 | -252% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.52 | 48.22 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.27 | 11.95 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.00 | 107.46 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement