Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSCGX
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$71.09
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$21.73
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.09M
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSCGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and LSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. LSCGX (128M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPAX (0.45) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSCGX (10 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.89 vs. CNPAX (11.66). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.82 vs. LSCGX (20.39).
| CNPAX | LSCGX | CNPAX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.95 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.13 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.484 | 13.177 | 125% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 128M | 124,219% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.66 | 13.89 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.09 | 68.97 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.82 | 20.39 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement