Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSCGX
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$69.09
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.49B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$21.67
Change+$0.05 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.32M
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSCGX commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and LSCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. LSCGX (132M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPAX (0.49) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPAX (23 years) vs LSCGX (9 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.33 vs. CNPAX (11.60). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.69 vs. LSCGX (36.66).
| CNPAX | LSCGX | CNPAX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.95 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.13 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.223 | 12.604 | 105% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 132M | 118,182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.60 | 23.33 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.45 | 67.86 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.69 | 36.66 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement