Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSCGX
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSCGX
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSCGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and LSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. LSCGX (127M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPAX (0.95) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSCGX (10 years). LSCGX (2.08) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSCGX (12.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.85 vs. LSCGX (6.70). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.97 vs. LSCGX (16.10).
| CNPAX | LSCGX | CNPAX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.95 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.08 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.244 | -1.257 | -576% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 127M | 129,134% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.85 | 6.70 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.05 | 52.18 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.97 | 16.10 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.05 | 113.14 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers