Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSCGX
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSCGX
CNPAX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSCGX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and LSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. LSCGX (119M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: CNPAX (0.95) vs LSCGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: CNPAX (25 years) vs LSCGX (10 years). LSCGX (2.08) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSCGX (12.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.64 vs. LSCGX (-11.41). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.54 vs. LSCGX (7.27).
| CNPAX | LSCGX | CNPAX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.95 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.08 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.176 | -6.601 | -94% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 119M | 142,017% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.64 | -11.41 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.31 | 46.07 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.54 | 7.27 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.98 | 88.29 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement