Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSGGX
CNPAX vs LSGGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSGGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$70.63
Change+$0.31 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.54B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Y
Price$24.64
Change+$0.23 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.51M
CNPAX vs LSGGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSGGX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and LSGGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. LSGGX (136M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: CNPAX (0.48) vs LSGGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSGGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSGGX (9 years). LSGGX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSGGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSGGX (100000). LSGGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.53 vs. CNPAX (12.73). LSGGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.84 vs. CNPAX (32.35).
| CNPAX | LSGGX | CNPAX / LSGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.95 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.13 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.730 | 16.627 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 136M | 116,912% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.73 | 27.53 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.82 | 72.14 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.35 | 35.84 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement