Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSGGX
CNPAX vs LSGGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSGGX
CNPAX vs LSGGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSGGX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and LSGGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. LSGGX (121M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: CNPAX (0.95) vs LSGGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSGGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSGGX (10 years). LSGGX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSGGX (12.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSGGX (100000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.80 vs. LSGGX (1.63). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.49 vs. LSGGX (15.99).
| CNPAX | LSGGX | CNPAX / LSGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.95 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.08 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.609 | -5.952 | -111% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 121M | 142,149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.80 | 1.63 | 785% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.57 | 43.47 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.49 | 15.99 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.95 | 127.41 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers