Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSGGX
CNPAX vs LSGGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSGGX
CNPAX vs LSGGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSGGX commentary
Aug 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and LSGGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. LSGGX (120M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: CNPAX (0.97) vs LSGGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSGGX: CNPAX (25 years) vs LSGGX (10 years). LSGGX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSGGX (12.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSGGX (100000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.32 vs. LSGGX (-3.17). CNPAX (15.15) and LSGGX (14.65) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CNPAX | LSGGX | CNPAX / LSGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.95 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.08 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.085 | -5.259 | -135% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 120M | 138,333% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.32 | -3.17 | -231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.22 | 52.89 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.15 | 14.65 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.77 | 109.92 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers