Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSGGX
CNPAX vs LSGGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSGGX
CNPAX vs LSGGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSGGX commentary
Aug 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and LSGGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. LSGGX (117M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: CNPAX (0.97) vs LSGGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSGGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSGGX (10 years). LSGGX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSGGX (12.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSGGX (100000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.66 vs. LSGGX (-4.81). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.85 vs. LSGGX (11.63).
| CNPAX | LSGGX | CNPAX / LSGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.95 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.08 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | -8.031 | -61% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 117M | 145,299% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | -4.81 | -138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.46 | 36.89 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.85 | 11.63 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.25 | 107.51 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers