Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSNGX
CNPAX vs LSNGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSNGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$70.65
Change+$0.34 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.47B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$24.81
Change+$0.13 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.7M
CNPAX vs LSNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSNGX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and LSNGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LSNGX (138M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: CNPAX (0.48) vs LSNGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSNGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSNGX (8 years). LSNGX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSNGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.03 vs. CNPAX (15.09). LSNGX return over 5 years is better than : 42.67 vs. CNPAX (36.01).
| CNPAX | LSNGX | CNPAX / LSNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.90 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.06 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.763 | 18.199 | 87% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 138M | 114,493% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.09 | 30.03 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.57 | 81.09 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.01 | 42.67 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement