Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSNGX
CNPAX vs LSNGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSNGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$71.09
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$23.97
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.09M
CNPAX vs LSNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSNGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and LSNGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. LSNGX (128M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: CNPAX (0.45) vs LSNGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSNGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSNGX (9 years). LSNGX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSNGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.07 vs. CNPAX (11.66). LSNGX (28.04) and CNPAX (27.82) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CNPAX | LSNGX | CNPAX / LSNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.90 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.06 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.484 | 14.197 | 116% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 128M | 124,219% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.66 | 15.07 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.09 | 74.96 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.82 | 28.04 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement