Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSNGX
CNPAX vs LSNGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSNGX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$69.97
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.24B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$24.15
Change+$0.10 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.93M
CNPAX vs LSNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSNGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and LSNGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LSNGX (134M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: CNPAX (0.49) vs LSNGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSNGX: CNPAX (23 years) vs LSNGX (8 years). LSNGX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSNGX (6.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.85 vs. CNPAX (16.95). LSNGX return over 5 years is better than : 47.18 vs. CNPAX (43.51).
| CNPAX | LSNGX | CNPAX / LSNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.90 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.06 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.649 | 14.578 | 100% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 134M | 117,910% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.95 | 31.85 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.86 | 73.15 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.51 | 47.18 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers