Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs LSNGX
CNPAX vs LSNGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs LSNGX
CNPAX vs LSNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. LSNGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and LSNGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. LSNGX (121M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: CNPAX (0.95) vs LSNGX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than LSNGX: CNPAX (24 years) vs LSNGX (9 years). LSNGX (1.01) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSNGX (12.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: CNPAX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. LSNGX (-1.45). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.82 vs. LSNGX (12.69).
| CNPAX | LSNGX | CNPAX / LSNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.90 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.01 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.325 | -6.176 | -86% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 121M | 140,496% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | -1.45 | -508% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | 41.14 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.82 | 12.69 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement