Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MECFX
CNPAX vs MECFX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MECFX
CNPAX vs MECFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MECFX commentary
Aug 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MECFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MECFX (134M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MECFX: CNPAX (0.97) vs MECFX (0.40). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MECFX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MECFX (10 years). MECFX (1.00) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MECFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MECFX: CNPAX (250) vs MECFX (1000000). CNPAX (8.53) and MECFX (8.20) have marching annual gain over last year. CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.21 vs. MECFX (2.09).
| CNPAX | MECFX | CNPAX / MECFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.90 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.00 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.541 | 7.954 | 70% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 134M | 126,866% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.40 | 246% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 8.20 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.25 | 31.81 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.21 | 2.09 | 583% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.34 | 65.13 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement