Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MECFX
CNPAX vs MECFX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MECFX
CNPAX vs MECFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MECFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MECFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MECFX (137M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MECFX: CNPAX (0.95) vs MECFX (0.39). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MECFX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MECFX (10 years). MECFX (1.00) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MECFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MECFX: CNPAX (250) vs MECFX (1000000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. MECFX (6.64). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.82 vs. MECFX (5.35).
| CNPAX | MECFX | CNPAX / MECFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.90 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.00 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.325 | 7.697 | 69% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 137M | 124,088% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.39 | 246% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | 6.64 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | 30.49 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.82 | 5.35 | 258% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.91 | 68.73 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers