Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MECVX
CNPAX vs MECVX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MECVX
CNPAX vs MECVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MECVX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MECVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MECVX (137M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MECVX: CNPAX (0.95) vs MECVX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MECVX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MECVX (10 years). MECVX (1.42) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MECVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). MECVX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MECVX: CNPAX (250) vs MECVX (2500). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. MECVX (5.98). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.82 vs. MECVX (2.27).
| CNPAX | MECVX | CNPAX / MECVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.42 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.42 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.325 | 7.427 | 72% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 70% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 137M | 124,088% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | 5.98 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | 28.25 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.82 | 2.27 | 609% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.91 | 61.66 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement