Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGFLX
CNPAX vs MGFLX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGFLX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$70.42
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
MassMutual Global Adm
Price$10.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.64M
CNPAX vs MGFLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGFLX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MGFLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. MGFLX (164M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGFLX: CNPAX (0.48) vs MGFLX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGFLX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGFLX (21 years). MGFLX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. MGFLX (6.00). MGFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGFLX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.57 vs. MGFLX (-3.69). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.09 vs. MGFLX (-29.19).
| CNPAX | MGFLX | CNPAX / MGFLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.23 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.23 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.386 | 9.100 | 169% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 164M | 96,951% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.57 | -3.69 | -367% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.29 | -21.81 | -162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.09 | -29.19 | -134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.36 | -30.95 | -308% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement