Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGFLX
CNPAX vs MGFLX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGFLX
CNPAX vs MGFLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGFLX commentary
Jun 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MGFLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MGFLX (143M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGFLX: CNPAX (0.95) vs MGFLX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGFLX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGFLX (21 years). MGFLX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MGFLX (24.00) and CNPAX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGFLX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.57 vs. MGFLX (-17.97). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.55 vs. MGFLX (-55.23).
| CNPAX | MGFLX | CNPAX / MGFLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.23 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.23 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.156 | 5.762 | 72% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 143M | 120,280% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | -17.97 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.72 | -25.92 | -153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.55 | -55.23 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.21 | -32.51 | -367% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers