Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGFLX
CNPAX vs MGFLX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGFLX
CNPAX vs MGFLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGFLX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MGFLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MGFLX (142M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGFLX: CNPAX (0.95) vs MGFLX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGFLX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGFLX (22 years). MGFLX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MGFLX (24.00) and CNPAX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGFLX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.25 vs. MGFLX (-18.78). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.31 vs. MGFLX (-55.21).
| CNPAX | MGFLX | CNPAX / MGFLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.23 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.23 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.970 | 7.426 | 94% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 142M | 121,127% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.25 | -18.78 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.36 | -26.72 | -147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.31 | -55.21 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.58 | -30.62 | -410% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers