Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGFNX
CNPAX vs MGFNX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGFNX
CNPAX vs MGFNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGFNX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a StrongBuy and MGFNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. MGFNX (138M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGFNX: CNPAX (0.97) vs MGFNX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGFNX: CNPAX (25 years) vs MGFNX (22 years). MGFNX (1.63) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MGFNX (24.00) and CNPAX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGFNX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.75 vs. MGFNX (-21.62). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.25 vs. MGFNX (-59.86).
| CNPAX | MGFNX | CNPAX / MGFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.63 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.63 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.110 | 6.600 | 123% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 138M | 120,290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.75 | -21.62 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.72 | -30.63 | -143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.25 | -59.86 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.47 | -43.24 | -269% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers