Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGFNX
CNPAX vs MGFNX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGFNX
CNPAX vs MGFNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGFNX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a StrongBuy and MGFNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. MGFNX (136M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGFNX: CNPAX (0.95) vs MGFNX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGFNX: CNPAX (25 years) vs MGFNX (22 years). MGFNX (1.63) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MGFNX (24.00) and CNPAX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGFNX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.90 vs. MGFNX (-26.33). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.24 vs. MGFNX (-63.05).
| CNPAX | MGFNX | CNPAX / MGFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.63 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.63 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.566 | 3.587 | 183% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 136M | 124,265% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.90 | -26.33 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.63 | -33.46 | -118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.24 | -63.05 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.91 | -43.83 | -269% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers