Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGFRX
CNPAX vs MGFRX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGFRX
CNPAX vs MGFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGFRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MGFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGFRX (141M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGFRX: CNPAX (0.95) vs MGFRX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGFRX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGFRX (12 years). MGFRX (1.38) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MGFRX (24.00) and CNPAX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGFRX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. MGFRX (-20.49). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.82 vs. MGFRX (-59.19).
| CNPAX | MGFRX | CNPAX / MGFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.38 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.38 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.325 | 8.034 | 66% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 141M | 120,567% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | -20.49 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | -33.13 | -103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.82 | -59.19 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.91 | -38.83 | -298% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers