Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGFSX
CNPAX vs MGFSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGFSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$70.66
Change+$1.05 (+1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.47B
MassMutual Global R5
Price$10.59
Change+$0.15 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.22M
CNPAX vs MGFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGFSX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MGFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. MGFSX (160M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGFSX: CNPAX (0.48) vs MGFSX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGFSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGFSX (21 years). MGFSX (1.03) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. MGFSX (6.00). MGFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGFSX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.25 vs. MGFSX (-4.59). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.09 vs. MGFSX (-29.31).
| CNPAX | MGFSX | CNPAX / MGFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.03 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.03 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.779 | 8.839 | 179% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 160M | 99,375% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.25 | -4.59 | -288% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.81 | -16.15 | -259% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.09 | -29.31 | -127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.34 | -22.31 | -512% |