Ad is loading...
CNPAX vs MGFSX
CNPAX vs MGFSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGFSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$62.43
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.32B
MassMutual Global R5
Price$9.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.99M
CNPAX vs MGFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGFSX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MGFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. MGFSX (151M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGFSX: CNPAX (0.54) vs MGFSX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGFSX: CNPAX (23 years) vs MGFSX (20 years). MGFSX (1.03) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. MGFSX (10.00). MGFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGFSX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.29 vs. MGFSX (-12.31). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.64 vs. MGFSX (-23.89).
| CNPAX | MGFSX | CNPAX / MGFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.03 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.03 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.294 | -3.392 | -68% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 142B | 151M | 94,040% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.29 | -12.31 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.34 | -22.63 | -125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.64 | -23.89 | -199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.72 | -36.94 | -194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...