Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGFSX
CNPAX vs MGFSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGFSX
CNPAX vs MGFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGFSX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MGFSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. MGFSX (133M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGFSX: CNPAX (0.95) vs MGFSX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGFSX: CNPAX (25 years) vs MGFSX (22 years). MGFSX (1.03) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MGFSX (24.00) and CNPAX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGFSX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.64 vs. MGFSX (-22.67). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.54 vs. MGFSX (-57.44).
| CNPAX | MGFSX | CNPAX / MGFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.03 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.03 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.176 | 5.486 | 113% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 133M | 127,068% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.64 | -22.67 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.31 | -25.66 | -157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.54 | -57.44 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.98 | -34.27 | -335% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement