Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGFYX
CNPAX vs MGFYX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGFYX
CNPAX vs MGFYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGFYX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MGFYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGFYX (136M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGFYX: CNPAX (0.95) vs MGFYX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGFYX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGFYX (22 years). MGFYX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MGFYX (24.00) and CNPAX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFYX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGFYX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.62 vs. MGFYX (-22.08). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.10 vs. MGFYX (-58.13).
| CNPAX | MGFYX | CNPAX / MGFYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.13 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.13 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.752 | 4.161 | 90% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 136M | 125,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.62 | -22.08 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.85 | -30.65 | -107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.10 | -58.13 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.33 | -35.78 | -314% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement