Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGFYX
CNPAX vs MGFYX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGFYX
CNPAX vs MGFYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGFYX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MGFYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. MGFYX (139M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGFYX: CNPAX (0.97) vs MGFYX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGFYX: CNPAX (25 years) vs MGFYX (22 years). MGFYX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MGFYX (24.00) and CNPAX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFYX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGFYX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.71 vs. MGFYX (-19.96). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.68 vs. MGFYX (-57.36).
| CNPAX | MGFYX | CNPAX / MGFYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.13 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.13 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.437 | 7.412 | 127% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 139M | 119,424% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.71 | -19.96 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.39 | -27.42 | -155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.68 | -57.36 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.89 | -36.40 | -327% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers