Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGFZX
CNPAX vs MGFZX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGFZX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$64.62
Change-$0.22 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.5B
MassMutual Global I
Price$9.83
Change-$0.04 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets157.68M
CNPAX vs MGFZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGFZX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MGFZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. MGFZX (158M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGFZX: CNPAX (0.54) vs MGFZX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGFZX: CNPAX (23 years) vs MGFZX (11 years). MGFZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. MGFZX (10.00). MGFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGFZX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. MGFZX (-10.36). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.28 vs. MGFZX (-21.87).
| CNPAX | MGFZX | CNPAX / MGFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.93 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.93 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.243 | 0.818 | 763% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 158M | 93,671% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.45 | -10.36 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.44 | -20.68 | -152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.28 | -21.87 | -234% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.53 | -34.80 | -220% |