Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGFZX
CNPAX vs MGFZX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGFZX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$73.05
Change+$0.15 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.14B
MassMutual Global I
Price$11.03
Change+$0.03 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.12M
CNPAX vs MGFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGFZX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MGFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. MGFZX (155M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGFZX: CNPAX (0.46) vs MGFZX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGFZX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGFZX (12 years). MGFZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. MGFZX (6.00). MGFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGFZX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.59 vs. MGFZX (-2.22). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.62 vs. MGFZX (-26.47).
| CNPAX | MGFZX | CNPAX / MGFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.93 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.93 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.695 | 12.781 | 154% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 155M | 105,806% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.59 | -2.22 | -658% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.42 | -3.42 | -1,711% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.62 | -26.47 | -157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.34 | -19.88 | -565% |