Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGFZX
CNPAX vs MGFZX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGFZX
CNPAX vs MGFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGFZX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MGFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MGFZX (143M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGFZX: CNPAX (0.95) vs MGFZX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGFZX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGFZX (12 years). MGFZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MGFZX (24.00) and CNPAX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGFZX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. MGFZX (-16.71). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.21 vs. MGFZX (-53.53).
| CNPAX | MGFZX | CNPAX / MGFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.93 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.93 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.877 | 6.551 | 74% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 143M | 120,280% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | -16.71 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.13 | -25.43 | -150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.21 | -53.53 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.88 | -27.33 | -457% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers