Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGFZX
CNPAX vs MGFZX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGFZX
CNPAX vs MGFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGFZX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MGFZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MGFZX (139M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGFZX: CNPAX (0.95) vs MGFZX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGFZX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGFZX (12 years). MGFZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MGFZX (24.00) and CNPAX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGFZX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.13 vs. MGFZX (-18.45). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.34 vs. MGFZX (-54.61).
| CNPAX | MGFZX | CNPAX / MGFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.93 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.93 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.431 | 6.551 | 113% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 139M | 123,741% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.13 | -18.45 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.21 | -24.39 | -173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.34 | -54.61 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.46 | -27.80 | -451% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers