Ad is loading...
CNPAX vs MGKAX
CNPAX vs MGKAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGKAX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$62.31
Change+$0.14 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.03B
Morgan Stanley Global Permanence A
Price$12.22
Change+$0.05 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.68M
CNPAX vs MGKAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGKAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MGKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. MGKAX (3.68M). MGKAX pays higher dividends than CNPAX: MGKAX (2.67) vs CNPAX (0.54). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGKAX: CNPAX (23 years) vs MGKAX (6 years). MGKAX (4.69) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). MGKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). MGKAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGKAX: CNPAX (250) vs MGKAX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. MGKAX (-1.09). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.35 vs. MGKAX (26.18).
| CNPAX | MGKAX | CNPAX / MGKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.35 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 4.69 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.097 | 8.467 | 25% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 142B | 3.68M | 3,855,553% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 2.67 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.61 | -1.09 | -516% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.08 | 22.22 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.35 | 26.18 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...