Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGKAX
CNPAX vs MGKAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGKAX
CNPAX vs MGKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGKAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MGKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MGKAX (4.31M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGKAX: CNPAX (0.95) vs MGKAX (0.88). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGKAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGKAX (7 years). MGKAX (8.98) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MGKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). MGKAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGKAX: CNPAX (250) vs MGKAX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.30 vs. MGKAX (-14.93). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.61 vs. MGKAX (-19.40).
| CNPAX | MGKAX | CNPAX / MGKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.35 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 8.98 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.450 | -1.019 | -633% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 4.31M | 3,990,719% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.88 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.30 | -14.93 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.51 | -3.46 | -1,201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.61 | -19.40 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement