Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGKAX
CNPAX vs MGKAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGKAX
CNPAX vs MGKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGKAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MGKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. MGKAX (4.72M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGKAX: CNPAX (0.95) vs MGKAX (0.88). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGKAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGKAX (7 years). MGKAX (8.98) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MGKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). MGKAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGKAX: CNPAX (250) vs MGKAX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.85 vs. MGKAX (-7.07). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.97 vs. MGKAX (-13.20).
| CNPAX | MGKAX | CNPAX / MGKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.35 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 8.98 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.244 | 3.905 | 186% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 4.72M | 3,476,786% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.88 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.85 | -7.07 | -196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.05 | 0.86 | 5,115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.97 | -13.20 | -151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.05 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement