Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGKCX
CNPAX vs MGKCX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGKCX
CNPAX vs MGKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGKCX commentary
Aug 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MGKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGKCX (45.1M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGKCX: CNPAX (0.97) vs MGKCX (0.35). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGKCX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGKCX (7 years). MGKCX (9.87) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MGKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGKCX: CNPAX (250) vs MGKCX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.39 vs. MGKCX (-16.37). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.87 vs. MGKCX (-25.80).
| CNPAX | MGKCX | CNPAX / MGKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.10 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 9.87 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.244 | 0.723 | 1,002% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 45.1M | 376,940% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.35 | 275% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.39 | -16.37 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.20 | -9.14 | -418% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.87 | -25.80 | -54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers