Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGLBX
CNPAX vs MGLBX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGLBX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$65.96
Change+$0.51 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.9B
Marsico Global
Price$29.12
Change+$0.29 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets403.51M
CNPAX vs MGLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGLBX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MGLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 149B vs. MGLBX (404M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGLBX: CNPAX (0.51) vs MGLBX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGLBX: CNPAX (23 years) vs MGLBX (18 years). MGLBX (1.44) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). MGLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLBX: CNPAX (250) vs MGLBX (2500). MGLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.24 vs. CNPAX (10.51). MGLBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.77 vs. CNPAX (45.18).
| CNPAX | MGLBX | CNPAX / MGLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.44 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.44 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.078 | 12.705 | 64% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149B | 404M | 36,881% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | 25.24 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.90 | 82.58 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.18 | 47.77 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.85 | 111.05 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement