Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGLBX
CNPAX vs MGLBX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGLBX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$68.69
Change-$0.42 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.64B
Marsico Global
Price$30.83
Change-$0.05 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets447.02M
CNPAX vs MGLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGLBX commentary
Jul 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MGLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. MGLBX (447M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGLBX: CNPAX (0.49) vs MGLBX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGLBX: CNPAX (23 years) vs MGLBX (18 years). MGLBX (1.44) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). MGLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLBX: CNPAX (250) vs MGLBX (2500). MGLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.62 vs. CNPAX (9.57). CNPAX (41.48) and MGLBX (41.23) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CNPAX | MGLBX | CNPAX / MGLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.44 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.44 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.551 | 20.524 | 61% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 447M | 34,899% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 24.62 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.84 | 113.50 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.48 | 41.23 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.84 | 122.44 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement