Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGLBX
CNPAX vs MGLBX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGLBX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$69.45
Change+$0.17 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.62B
Marsico Global
Price$31.71
Change+$0.14 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets466.84M
CNPAX vs MGLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGLBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MGLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. MGLBX (467M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGLBX: CNPAX (0.48) vs MGLBX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGLBX: CNPAX (23 years) vs MGLBX (18 years). MGLBX (1.44) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). MGLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLBX: CNPAX (250) vs MGLBX (2500). MGLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.51 vs. CNPAX (19.52). MGLBX return over 5 years is better than : 41.51 vs. CNPAX (38.43).
| CNPAX | MGLBX | CNPAX / MGLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.44 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.44 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.796 | 23.417 | 59% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157B | 467M | 33,619% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.52 | 41.51 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.14 | 96.33 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.43 | 41.51 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.15 | 128.27 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement