Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGLBX
CNPAX vs MGLBX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGLBX
CNPAX vs MGLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGLBX commentary
Jun 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MGLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MGLBX (416M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGLBX: CNPAX (0.95) vs MGLBX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGLBX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGLBX (19 years). MGLBX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MGLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLBX: CNPAX (250) vs MGLBX (2500). MGLBX (9.24) and CNPAX (8.94) have marching annual gain over last year. MGLBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.70 vs. CNPAX (14.59).
| CNPAX | MGLBX | CNPAX / MGLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.33 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.33 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.420 | 11.848 | 29% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 416M | 41,346% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.94 | 9.24 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.73 | 87.17 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.59 | 25.70 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.66 | 177.46 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement