Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGTSX
CNPAX vs MGTSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGTSX
CNPAX vs MGTSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGTSX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MGTSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. MGTSX (3.05B). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGTSX: CNPAX (0.95) vs MGTSX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGTSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGTSX (13 years). MGTSX (0.85) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. MGTSX (11.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGTSX: CNPAX (250) vs MGTSX (5000000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.85 vs. MGTSX (-3.92). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.97 vs. MGTSX (-16.78).
| CNPAX | MGTSX | CNPAX / MGTSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.85 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.85 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.244 | 5.647 | 128% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 3.05B | 5,381% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.85 | -3.92 | -353% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.05 | 43.54 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.97 | -16.78 | -119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.05 | 130.32 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers