Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGTSX
CNPAX vs MGTSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGTSX
CNPAX vs MGTSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGTSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MGTSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGTSX (2.96B). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGTSX: CNPAX (0.95) vs MGTSX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGTSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGTSX (13 years). MGTSX (0.85) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. MGTSX (11.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGTSX: CNPAX (250) vs MGTSX (5000000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. MGTSX (-6.58). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.82 vs. MGTSX (-21.29).
| CNPAX | MGTSX | CNPAX / MGTSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.85 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.85 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.325 | 5.424 | 98% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 2.96B | 5,739% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | -6.58 | -112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | 33.03 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.82 | -21.29 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.91 | 145.31 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers