Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MGWRX
CNPAX vs MGWRX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MGWRX
CNPAX vs MGWRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MGWRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MGWRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGWRX (813M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MGWRX: CNPAX (0.95) vs MGWRX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MGWRX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MGWRX (23 years). MGWRX (1.56) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). CNPAX (23.00) and MGWRX (22.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGWRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: MGWRX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. MGWRX (-5.30). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.82 vs. MGWRX (-7.19).
| CNPAX | MGWRX | CNPAX / MGWRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.47 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.56 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.325 | -2.417 | -220% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 813M | 20,910% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | -5.30 | -139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | 4.22 | 810% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.82 | -7.19 | -192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.91 | 76.13 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement