Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MLMAX
CNPAX vs MLMAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MLMAX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$64.84
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.5B
Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core A
Price$21.34
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.89M
CNPAX vs MLMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MLMAX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MLMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. MLMAX (43.9M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MLMAX: CNPAX (0.54) vs MLMAX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MLMAX: CNPAX (23 years) vs MLMAX (9 years). MLMAX (2.00) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). MLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). MLMAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMAX: CNPAX (250) vs MLMAX (1000). MLMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.13 vs. CNPAX (7.45). MLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 87.48 vs. CNPAX (51.28).
| CNPAX | MLMAX | CNPAX / MLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.35 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.00 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.243 | 3.087 | 202% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 43.9M | 337,130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.45 | 11.13 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.44 | 49.83 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.28 | 87.48 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.53 | N/A | - |