Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MLMAX
CNPAX vs MLMAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MLMAX
CNPAX vs MLMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MLMAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MLMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MLMAX (66.9M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MLMAX: CNPAX (0.97) vs MLMAX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MLMAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MLMAX (10 years). MLMAX (1.85) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). MLMAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMAX: CNPAX (250) vs MLMAX (1000). MLMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.54 vs. CNPAX (6.66). MLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.41 vs. CNPAX (12.85).
| CNPAX | MLMAX | CNPAX / MLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.35 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.85 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | 6.546 | 75% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 66.9M | 254,111% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 12.54 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.46 | 55.12 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.85 | 43.41 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.25 | 154.02 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers