Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MLMCX
CNPAX vs MLMCX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MLMCX
CNPAX vs MLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MLMCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and MLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. MLMCX (64.7M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MLMCX: CNPAX (0.95) vs MLMCX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MLMCX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MLMCX (10 years). MLMCX (2.66) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMCX: CNPAX (250) vs MLMCX (1000). MLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.97 vs. CNPAX (13.85). MLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.42 vs. CNPAX (19.97).
| CNPAX | MLMCX | CNPAX / MLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.10 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.66 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.244 | 4.319 | 168% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 64.7M | 253,478% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.85 | 14.97 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.05 | 59.50 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.97 | 37.42 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.05 | 135.01 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers