Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MLMSX
CNPAX vs MLMSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MLMSX
CNPAX vs MLMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MLMSX commentary
Aug 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MLMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MLMSX (66.9M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MLMSX: CNPAX (0.97) vs MLMSX (0.10). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MLMSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MLMSX (10 years). MLMSX (16.59) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MLMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMSX: CNPAX (250) vs MLMSX (5000000). MLMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.01 vs. CNPAX (6.66). MLMSX return over 5 years is better than : 46.23 vs. CNPAX (12.85).
| CNPAX | MLMSX | CNPAX / MLMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.95 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 16.59 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | 6.777 | 73% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 66.9M | 254,111% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.10 | 970% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 13.01 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.46 | 56.85 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.85 | 46.23 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.25 | 161.97 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers