Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MLNAX
CNPAX vs MLNAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MLNAX
CNPAX vs MLNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MLNAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MLNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MLNAX (439M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MLNAX: CNPAX (0.97) vs MLNAX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MLNAX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MLNAX (10 years). MLNAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). MLNAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLNAX: CNPAX (250) vs MLNAX (1000). MLNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. CNPAX (6.66). MLNAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.58 vs. CNPAX (12.85).
| CNPAX | MLNAX | CNPAX / MLNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.33 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.33 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | 6.604 | 75% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 439M | 38,724% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 8.15 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.46 | 67.83 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.85 | 50.58 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.25 | 183.60 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement