Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MLNCX
CNPAX vs MLNCX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MLNCX
CNPAX vs MLNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MLNCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MLNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MLNCX (439M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MLNCX: CNPAX (0.97) vs MLNCX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MLNCX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MLNCX (10 years). MLNCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLNCX: CNPAX (250) vs MLNCX (1000). MLNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.21 vs. CNPAX (6.66). MLNCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.68 vs. CNPAX (12.85).
| CNPAX | MLNCX | CNPAX / MLNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.08 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.08 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | 6.143 | 80% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 439M | 38,724% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 7.21 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.46 | 63.89 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.85 | 44.68 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.25 | 163.38 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement