Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MLNIX
CNPAX vs MLNIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MLNIX
CNPAX vs MLNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MLNIX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MLNIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MLNIX (439M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MLNIX: CNPAX (0.97) vs MLNIX (0.05). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MLNIX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MLNIX (10 years). MLNIX (1.05) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). MLNIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLNIX: CNPAX (250) vs MLNIX (1000000). MLNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.47 vs. CNPAX (6.66). MLNIX return over 5 years is better than : 52.90 vs. CNPAX (12.85).
| CNPAX | MLNIX | CNPAX / MLNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.00 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.05 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | 6.765 | 73% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 439M | 38,724% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.05 | 1,900% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 8.47 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.46 | 69.26 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.85 | 52.90 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.25 | 191.50 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement