Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs NBSSX
CNPAX vs NBSSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs NBSSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$64.84
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.5B
Neuberger Berman Focus Investor
Price$31.80
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets732.06M
CNPAX vs NBSSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. NBSSX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and NBSSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. NBSSX (732M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than NBSSX: CNPAX (0.54) vs NBSSX (0.12). CNPAX was incepted earlier than NBSSX: CNPAX (23 years) vs NBSSX (70 years). NBSSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). NBSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSSX: CNPAX (250) vs NBSSX (1000). NBSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.86 vs. CNPAX (7.45). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.28 vs. NBSSX (34.08).
| CNPAX | NBSSX | CNPAX / NBSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 70 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.243 | 4.607 | 136% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 732M | 20,219% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.12 | 462% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.45 | 12.86 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.44 | 49.33 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.28 | 34.08 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.53 | 19.63 | 390% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers