Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs NBSSX
CNPAX vs NBSSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs NBSSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$66.32
Change-$0.80 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.4B
Neuberger Berman Focus Investor
Price$32.56
Change-$0.36 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets754.98M
CNPAX vs NBSSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. NBSSX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and NBSSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. NBSSX (755M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than NBSSX: CNPAX (0.51) vs NBSSX (0.11). CNPAX was incepted earlier than NBSSX: CNPAX (23 years) vs NBSSX (70 years). NBSSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). NBSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSSX: CNPAX (250) vs NBSSX (1000). NBSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.19 vs. CNPAX (8.81). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.94 vs. NBSSX (34.18).
| CNPAX | NBSSX | CNPAX / NBSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 70 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.668 | 8.325 | 104% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 755M | 20,132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.11 | 464% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.81 | 15.19 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.80 | 66.76 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.94 | 34.18 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.23 | 24.66 | 342% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement