Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs NBSSX
CNPAX vs NBSSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs NBSSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$72.81
Change-$0.41 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
Neuberger Berman Focus Investor
Price$36.70
Change-$0.17 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets830.43M
CNPAX vs NBSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. NBSSX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and NBSSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. NBSSX (830M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than NBSSX: CNPAX (0.46) vs NBSSX (0.10). CNPAX was incepted earlier than NBSSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs NBSSX (70 years). NBSSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). NBSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSSX: CNPAX (250) vs NBSSX (1000). NBSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.16 vs. CNPAX (13.83). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.19 vs. NBSSX (28.01).
| CNPAX | NBSSX | CNPAX / NBSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 70 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.302 | 21.323 | 91% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 830M | 19,759% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.10 | 476% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.83 | 23.16 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.53 | 91.29 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.19 | 28.01 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.57 | 45.17 | 240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement