Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs NBSSX
CNPAX vs NBSSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs NBSSX
CNPAX vs NBSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. NBSSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a StrongBuy and NBSSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. NBSSX (820M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than NBSSX: CNPAX (0.95) vs NBSSX (0.25). CNPAX was incepted earlier than NBSSX: CNPAX (25 years) vs NBSSX (71 years). NBSSX (0.90) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). NBSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSSX: CNPAX (250) vs NBSSX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.90 vs. NBSSX (0.60). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.24 vs. NBSSX (2.38).
| CNPAX | NBSSX | CNPAX / NBSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.90 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.90 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 71 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.566 | 8.045 | 82% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 820M | 20,610% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.25 | 387% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.90 | 0.60 | 652% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.63 | 57.13 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.24 | 2.38 | 473% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.91 | 44.71 | 264% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement